Showing posts with label hybrid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hybrid. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Hydrogen Fuel Cells Are Not The Answer

Recently Top Gear had a segment on the "world changing" Honda FCX Clarity, a commercially available (in California and Japan) hydrogen fuel cell car. The hyperbole spewed forth during the segment was over the top even for Top Gear. Statements about how this car is the single most important thing to happen to automobiles in the past 100 years, or that it makes all battery electric vehicles obsolete were thrown around with gay abandon. Jeremy Clarkson, famous for "dissing" plug-in electric/hybrid vehicles among other things, was in full agreement with James May's assessments that this car is basically Jesus with wheels.

It annoyed me no end and actually prevented me from falling asleep for an hour or so as their biased comments kept bouncing around in my head. Sure, hydrogen fuel cell cars are a step in the right direction (i.e. away from oil dependence) but to liken it to the invention of the internal combustion engine was just too much for me.

Refuelling

What most boggled my mind was May's joy in finding that he had to stop every 250 miles (~400 km) in the Clarity to fill up on liquid hydrogen at the few and far between filling stations at a cost similar to what we pay for petrol. Surely if we're going to have a revolution in motoring it won't involve making things worse for us by opening the door for a whole new generation of cartels and corporations to rule our driving.

Currently I travel around 450-500 km in my Nissan Pulsar per tank and I despise having to divert from my route just to fill up, and that's with petrol stations all over the place. My vote goes to whichever technology means I don't have to keep stopping at some third party establishment where the unit price fluctuates hourly. Imagine if the local store had a sign out the front showing how much a litre of milk was going to cost you if you bought it right now.

The Power

Ahh, but the hydrogen fuel cells emit only water as a byproduct but BEVs use the electricity from the AC outlet and where does that come from? This is one of Clarkson's oft repeated BEV-bashing comments and is based on the fact that most household power comes from polluting sources like coal, natural gas, nuclear power etc which is totally true. Unfortunately for the Clarity electricity is required to produce the hydrogen that it needs, as are the raw materials the hydrogen is ripped from. Once the hydrogen is prepared it still needs to be shipped and trucked to fueling stations which uses up even more energy.

Wikipedia says that "As of 2006, 49.0% of the electricity produced in the United States comes from coal, 19.4% comes from nuclear, 20.0% comes from natural gas, 7.0% from hydroelectricity, 1.6% from petroleum and the remaining 3.1% mostly coming from geothermal, solar and biomass.[32] When hydrogen is produced through electrolysis, the energy comes from these sources. Though the fuel cell itself will only emit heat and water as waste, pollution is often caused when generating the electricity required to produce the hydrogen that the fuel cell uses as its power source (for example, when coal, oil, or natural gas-generated electricity is used)."

Surely the best answer would be to cut out the middle men and use the electricity directly and via the billions of AC power outlets around the world. Or even better, get yourself a nice solar panel set up in your house to charge your car for free.

Batteries

The Clarity and other fuel cell vehicles don't require batteries for storing power. Batteries are the biggest cause for concern in BEVs in that they take a while to recharge, they don't hold the charge long enough, they're heavy and they're made from finite natural resources such as zinc, nickel and other metals. There are a few points here that I'd like to address.

Charging Time

During Top Gear's test of the Tesla Roadster in the same episode, the statement was made that it would take 16 hours to charge the car's battery pack completely. As part of Tesla's response to the review it was said "that the 16-hour recharge time quoted by Top Gear is an absolute worst-case scenario - sort of like filling your gas tank using a thousand Dixie Cups full of petrol." The Tesla website says it can take as little as 3.5 hours with the High Power Connector which you'd install in your garage at home. Countries with higher voltage AC, like Australia's 240 volt, 50Hz power, will be able to charge their cars faster.

The general public will have to change their thinking around charging their cars. Currently the thinking is that it is same as filling up with petrol but in actual fact it is a lot more like how you handle the power in your mobile phone. I keep my phone plugged in at work and I have a charger at home. It never goes flat.

Of course, you aren't required to charge the car's battery totally each and every time you plug it in. If you need a quick charge you can give the car enough juice to get you where you want to go. Cars like the Chevy Volt take the idea a little further by having a secondary power source (a small internal combustion engine) to generate the electricity if you get into trouble.

Battery Technology

Battery technology has taken great leaps in the past few decades. Remember the handbag sized battery packs that were required to power mobile phones back in the 80s? How much smaller are the batteries you now find in phones and laptops? Even if we can reduce the size of the batteries by half over the next decade that's a huge leap. Regardless of Top Gear's admittedly ficticious review of the Tesla Roadster, it comes with a custom lithium ion battery pack that gives you up to 220 miles (300 km) per charge which is far more than I'd ever drive in a single day.

Servicing

After the Clarity review, as May and Clarkson dried their tears of joy, an off-hand comment was made that you might never have to take your Clarity in for servicing as it only has "one moving part". Sure, the propulsion system only has one moving part (the electric motor) but what about the wheels, axles, tires, brakes, suspension, steering and accessories?

This is the case for all cars using electric propulsion. Doing away with the noisy and messy internal combustion engine doesn't mean you don't need your car serviced, it just means the service will be easier, cleaner and maybe less frequent.

The Final Straw

May's final statement sums up everything that was wrong with his Honda Clarity review nicely. To paraphrase, he said the Clarity was the most important car in living memory because it was just like the cars we drive today. Fuel-cell vehicles are more polluting, rely on an overblown production, transportation and delivery infrastructure, are more complex than BEVs and with advancements in photovoltaic panels (solar panels), battery technology and newer methods of generating clean electricity maybe we should be trying keep things simple instead of just doing what we've always done.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Fuel Prices Have Dropped. Yay, Let's Buy SUVs!

Here we go again, the price of petrol ("gas" if you don't know the difference between liquids and solids) has dropped back to the price it was a few years ago and people have already forgotten how much money they were forking out only a few short weeks ago to fill their tanks.

Autoblog Green tells us the sad tale of a manufacturer kicking their SUV/Truck manufacturing plants back up a notch in anticipation of increased demand after almost shutting them down over the past year and people who went through a car downsizing are now feeling buyer's remorse.

All price and environmental issues aside, oil is a fossil fuel and therefore a finite resource. Why go burning through something we'll still need in the foreseeable future for the production of plastics and the like when there are alternatives already available. All the people who were bitching and moaning about the price of petrol, imagine if you drove up to the bowser and there was no petrol at all.

Now I'm not a big fan of hybrids as they don't really solve the problem, they just make people who would have driven a medium sized car use the fuel of a small car or a more efficient car. Ultimately you'll still need to stop and fill up with fuel which is a chore and plug in electric cars are still a few years away from being in my garage.

So while I wait for my Holden Volt or Mitsubishi iMiEV I've been trying to drive more efficiently using some basic hypermiling techniques (apparently it's the word of the year for 2008) and tracking my success with Fuel Frog. My last fill up shows I averaged 7.7 litres per 100km, not too shabby, and that's basically from accelerating and braking slowly and coasting when possible.

While I was stoked to pay only $1.19 AUD per litre for my tank of dead dinosaurs I still hate having to stop for petrol. At the weekend we drove to Marysville which has a lot of trees and not much else for half the trip and I was thinking how screwed we'd be if we ran out of fuel out there.

And if that's not enough, now we have ninja kittens driving around on our roads!

While I'm on the topic, take a look at these car ads from the 1970s during the "energy crisis", look familiar?

Thursday, July 24, 2008

550 Km Prius Gives Hope For All Electric Vehicles

A Toyota Prius-based taxi in Cairns, Australia had clocked up 550 kilometers in travel before it required a battery pack replacement, that's around 340,000 miles for those living in the olden days.

This is obviously good news for Toyota as it may alay some of the fears behind people taking up their whale-shaped hybrid but it's also good news for all electric vehicles and hybrids.

The NiMH battery tech in use by the Prius is pretty old in comparison to packs in some of the newer vehicles coming or already on the road. To hear that a battery pack will sustain thousands of charges and discharges for up to 550 Kms (easily twice more than I'd ever drive in a single vehicle) means the rather hefty replacement cost may never need to be forked over and maybe when it does happen battery tech will have improved enough to make them cheaper and more efficient.

The taxi company mentioned that their Prius cost half as much to run and half as much to maintain as a regular vehicle in their fleet. Imagine the savings if they used a car that didn't rely on fossil fuels for propulsion.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

World First LPG Hybrid Vehicle

Today CarAdvice.com.au have an interesting article about a new Hyundai Elantra LPG Hybrid. Up until now all hybrids have run on petrol (gas) with Li-Ion batteries but the "Elantra LPI Hybrid Electric Vehicle" runs on LPG and has Li-poly (Lithium Polymer) batteries. Both firsts in a production car.

"Powered by a 1.6-litre Liquefied Petroleum Injected (LPI) Gamma engine coupled with a 15kW electric motor, the Elantra LPI HEV is classed as a mild-type hybrid vehicle and qualifies as a Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle - emitting just 103g/km of CO2 and 90 percent fewer pollutants."

This means it'll be 40 percent cheaper to operate than other hybrids currently available and 50 percent less than a bog standard Elantra. Pity they're so ugly.

Friday, June 20, 2008

Gen 1 Chevy Volt To Cost $40K USD

So now Bob Lutz, GM's Vice President, tells us that the Chevy Volt which was pretty much promised to be sold in the US at around $30K is more likely to be $40K. $40K at a loss to GM. But that's the price you pay to innovate.

Seen by many as the saviour of the (US) car industry, the 2010 Volt promises so much and the almost daily news we get on its progress toward release helps. Personally I'd buy one if I had the cash and it was released and it was available in Australia. At least there's some good news ahead.